SO much has happened since I last posted (which is why I haven't written in so long). Last time I wrote, I was in the midst of oral arguments. (Be warned... this is a reeeeeeally long post)
A little background: our school does its 1L oral arguments in conjunction with the Moot Court team, which essentially act as an audition for the Moot Court honors program. After the first two voluntary rounds, the 1Ls can volunteer to argue a third round of arguments. After this third round, the top 16 finalists are selected. From there, the actual competition starts. The top 16 argue one-on one in pairs in single elimination rounds. After each round a winner is chosen to go on to the next round. The top 16 is narrowed down to 8, then to 4, then to 2 then to one. Pretty intense.
Basically, the last time I wrote I was prepping for the mandatory round.
THIRD ROUND
The week after that (last weekend) were the optional third rounds. It turns out that 160 of the 1L students opted to argue these rounds, which were conducted downtown at the CA Superior Court building. My partner and I were able to argue in that round together, each of us on our own separate issue, for 10 minutes each (both arguing for the plaintiff). The judges in that round were alumni of my law school. The judges we had for that round were pretty aggressive (one in particular) - lots of questions, very critical, really pushing our arguments. After arguing this round, we went home to await the results.
FOURTH ROUND
On Monday after the third round, the Finalists and Alternates were announced for both Writers and Oralists. Both my legal writing partner and I were announced as members of the 16 Finalists! From this point on in the competition, each of us was on our own, arguing both issues (one of which we had not ever prepared/argued), so Monday through Thursday was spent RAPIDLY learning the entire second issue. Even though my partner and I weren't arguing together, we collaborated all week and prepared one another for the opposite issue. The fourth rounds were scheduled on Thursday evening (April 2nd), after classes (this was awesome because C got to come watch... he was out of town during the third rounds, so he was unable to see my partner and I kick butt the weekend before).
Fourth round is tough because each of us were paired up head-to-head and had to argue for a full 20 minutes each, both issues. I happened to be paired up against one of my friends from my section. This round was judged by a panel of alumni as well, and was held in the CA Superior Court again. In this round, even though I was learning a new issue, I still got to argue the same side (plaintiff) that I had prepared for the first and third rounds. It was tough to argue for a full 20 minutes again, and the judges were also quite aggressive.
Directly after the fourth round, we were all taken to a holding room, where the winners of each round were announced. I was announced as the winner of my round, and my legal writing partner had also won her round, so we both moved on to the quarter-final round, consisting of 8 quarter finalists...
FIFTH ROUND
The tough thing was that this quarter final round happened RIGHT after the fourth round. The fourth round winners were announced, then we had 15-30 minutes to get ready for our next round against one of the other quarter finalists. Fortunately, the guy I was arguing against was originally arguing for the defendant, so each of us elected to stay on the same side (I argued for the plaintiff again, though I had prepared to argue for the defense just in case). Our judges were ready to go, so after 15 minutes of waiting, we were hustled into the court room and started our arguments.
Fifth round was definitely tough. The judges were very critical, asked very pointed/specific/difficult questions, and really kept us on our toes. I came out of the round, having argued the full 20 minutes successfully, but not knowing how I did. Of all the rounds up to this point, I felt as though the fifth round was one of my weakest because the judges were so rough. However, C, who had watched the previous round, said he thought that this fifth round argument was better than my fourth.
At the end of this round, the winners were announced. My legal writing partner (who had to argue for the defense, not by choice) was knocked out of her round, but I was announced as a winner of my round again! This meant I was one of the top 4 semi-finalists. I was paired up against another one of my friends who also had been arguing for the plaintiff. At this point, something inside me wanted to argue the opposite side (maybe I'm a little crazy). I ended up getting assigned to argue the defense for the semi-final rounds, which were scheduled for Saturday (April 4th), which meant that I had one full day to prepare arguments for the opposite (off-brief) side.
SIXTH ROUND
So the semi-finals (top 4) were argued on Saturday (yesterday) at the California Court of Appeals in Pasadena. GORGEOUS location. Even though it was Saturday morning (first day of Spring Break, incidentally), my two best friends from school, the devoted husband, and many of my teachers and other friends from my section were there to watch the arguments. For some reason I was so very calm...
Sixth round went really well, actually. My opponent went first (representing the plaintiff), arguing for 20 minutes. I was glad to be arguing second, because it gave me a chance to watch the judges. As the defendant/appellee, it is helpful to listen to the points the judges focus on with the plaintiff, since those will be my strongest arguments as defendant. After my opponent, I went up to argue my side. Of all my rounds, I felt the most confident for this one, even though I was off-brief. I picked my strongest three points for each issue and was able to bring my arguments back to those points well. The judges ask a ton of pointed and critical questions, so it's our job to answer the questions while also directing the argument through the points we need to make. I felt that I was able to do that the best in this round. I wasn't sure how I did, though, because my opponent did a spectacular job as well.
At the end of this round, the judges came back and announced that I had won my round (!!!). They gave very complimentary feedback about our arguments. The chief justice for that round was actually a Federal Judge in California, and he offered both my opponent and me summer externships in his office (!!!!!!!!). [side note: earlier in this crazy week on Tuesday, I had just interviewed and landed an externship working for a city attorney... however, I will have to decline that offer because the job working for this judge is such an amazing opportunity! Yay for summer employment!]
SEVENTH ROUND
So after I won the round and was given the job offer, I was pretty much in shock... but there was still the final round. The winner of the other quarter round was another girl, so I was arguing against her head-to-head in the final round. She had also argued for the defense in her quarter round (also off-brief). My strategy was to really focus on preparing the defense side, and then to stick to that side again if I advanced (it is VERY hard to argue one side then turn around and argue the opposite side 30 minutes later). My opponent had the same plan, so we had to flip a coin to see who got to stay on the defense. Fortunately, I won the coin toss. I spent the 30 minutes between rounds relaxing and mentally preparing... I didn't practice at all because I had JUST argued that side in my sixth round.
The final round was big-time. The three justices judging the round were all actual judges (11th circuit, New Mexico Supreme Court, Wisconsin Supreme Court) who had flown in for this round. The round was video-taped (I think because the legal writing professors next year will use this round in order to instruct the 1Ls about how to do oral arguments). Several of my professors, my friends, and all the current moot court members were there watching the round. As I said, it was big-time.
The last round was very difficult. The judges basically took turns throwing questions at us, and very aggressively attacking our arguments. I had a tough time, too, because I was arguing on behalf of the big drug companies of the fictional state of Westmoreland, whereas my opponent was arguing for the injured plaintiff whose hands had been paralyzed (no sympathy factor for my side at all!). The judges basically grilled both of us for 20 full minutes, then went back to deliberate. I honestly had no idea how I did at the end of the round since it was so tough to get my points out between the questions. The judges asked fantastic questions, but it was very tough to keep my argument on track and focused.
The judges came back out after what felt like an eternity, and announced me the winner!!!! Me!!! I was so shocked. I felt as though I had done well in the previous rounds, but I had never dreamed that I would be the one to win the competition. Very overwhelming. After this round we went to the Moot Court awards dinner, which was a blast. (I also won a pretty sweet goody-bag with some great prizes!)
AFTERMATH
It's such a relief now to be done with all of this. I had been working on this fact pattern for months, preparing my paper with my partner. Then, even though the paper was done, we still had to live with this case for a month, arguing every weekend for the past four weeks. Looking back, it was a very difficult path, but it was worth all the time/energy/sweat/tears that went into it.
I sit here on Sunday, still a little amazed. I'm attempting the mental transition from Moot Court argument-mode to preparing-for-finals mode... even though it's spring break, I now have to start working on finals prep and outlining each of my classes. As always in law school, one thing ends and then another fifty things are lined up, waiting to go. It was nice to take this moment to recap and defragment - deep breath - time to outline Criminal Procedure.
: D
K